Loss of PROPERTY Lamented, not LOSS OF LIFE

"The mother of the Stanton Heights man who is accused of killing three Pittsburgh police officers filed a lawsuit against Allegheny County on Wednesday claiming that the negligence of the 911 dispatcher who took her call on the domestic dispute may have led to the shootout on April 4, 2009, as well as the damage caused to her home."

Let's GET THIS STRAIGHT:

No, madam. That kind of thinking is precisely what lead to the raising of a son CAPABLE of such a thing.

The fault lies directly with the shooter, and no one else. Period.


"Margaret Poplawski notes that she warned the dispatcher when she called that her son, Richard Poplawski, had firearms in the home..."


No AGAIN.

You needed to be ASKED if there were guns involved.



You see..... when a family member becomes violent and needs to be restrained (and/or arrested) ...here's what most reasonable people would do when calling for police assistance when they KNOW their own bouncing baby LOOSE CANNON has a stockpile of weapons on hand, you say....



"OH MY GOD, HE HAS GUNS, HE HAS GUNS, HE HAS GUNS HERE IN THE HOUSE!!"



(That should be the first thing out of your mouth) ... it would not be part of a question-and-answer exchange between you and the dispatcher...

that is, if you're an upright citizen yourself... and you know the men you're requesting come and help you will be walking into a fucking AMBUSH... if you're not thinking "THIS'LL TEACH HIM!"



But no, now you're claiming 'damages'. Loss of property.

Negligence.



You are without question......the *most pathetic, amoral individual currently in the running for that title. (Read that article, and be as flabbergasted as I was when I read it.)


You

(quite literally)

make me sick.



Just when you think you've heard it all... you realize you haven't. Not by a long shot. Great bleeding Christ!